User talk:TattleTaleStrangler

From SpongePedia, the First SpongeBob Wiki.
Revision as of 20:14, 11 November 2010 by TattleTaleStrangler (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to SpongePedia,

Contents

Vocabulary

This may not concern you, but remember correct vocabulary with words. Such as: Spell SpongeBob with a Capital S and a capital B for bob. Not spongebob, not SpongeBob, not spongeBob, but SpongeBob ! Please also use every character’s name with a capital—example: write [[SpongeBob SquarePants|SpongeBob]] and when you click "Save page" it will come out with a link like this: SpongeBob!

Enjoy SpongePedia and I hope you succeed in this site. Please, contact any of the Team on their talk pages if you have a problem :) If you have any questions, don't be afraid to ask! --Aximilli-Esgarrouth-Isthill 09:25, 28 February 2010 (PST)


Guidelines for all users on this talk page:
  1. No Spam, no insults please.
  2. No too long off-topic-stuff ;-)
  3. Please keep attention to the layout and formal stuff, meaning you should create an own headline for a new topic.
  4. Always stay spongetastic ;-D



My archive



Unprotecting seasons

Can you unprotect Seasons 6-8 and the Seasons 6-8 templates? -- SpongiBob 12:08, 3 October 2010 (PDT)

Do you mean ALL episode articles? Templates are unprotected in a second. Please inform me when you're finished. --TtsTalk 12:14, 3 October 2010 (PDT)
Well, you know how 26 episodes are in Seasons 6 and 7? I wanna correct everything on the episodes. The Season Articles too. Could you unprotect the Season 6-8 articles? -- SpongiBob 12:16, 3 October 2010 (PDT)
Uhm, that doesn't make sense, it would be more work to unprotect and then protect the pages than just doing it myself. Btw: It's just about 12 Episodes of every season, which have to be corrected, isn't it? --TtsTalk 12:18, 3 October 2010 (PDT)
I think so. -- SpongiBob 12:21, 3 October 2010 (PDT)
Can you now unprotect the Season 6-8 templates? -- SpongiBob 12:33, 3 October 2010 (PDT)
You can protect everything again now. Could you unprotect 121-126? -- SpongiBob 12:45, 3 October 2010 (PDT)
Ok, gimme a second^^ --TtsTalk 12:45, 3 October 2010 (PDT)
Wow, how do you unprotect them so fast?^^ xD You can protect them again. Also, could you unprotect the Seasons template and 143-149 with Legends of Bikini Bottom? That would we all. Thanks -- SpongiBob 12:55, 3 October 2010 (PDT)
No no, thank YOU :) for the good work correcting all that stuff^^ Well, I kinda have my own technique to work with Tabs and.. yeah^^ Unprotect it in a second. --TtsTalk 13:13, 3 October 2010 (PDT)
Thank you... again! You can now protect every single thing I asked you to unprotect. -- SpongiBob 13:27, 3 October 2010 (PDT)
Done. Btw, you seem to know this wiki very good........ --TtsTalk 13:35, 3 October 2010 (PDT)
Yeah. I started looking at how you guys work here a few months ago, and I decided to start working here too. -- SpongiBob 13:36, 3 October 2010 (PDT)
Could you unprotect Tunnel of Glove, Whelk Attack, and the Season 7 template again?^^ -- SpongiBob 09:20, 4 October 2010 (PDT)

Jail page

Need any help on your Jail page? -- SpongiBob 09:43, 4 October 2010 (PDT)

Nope, thanks^^ --TtsTalk 09:54, 4 October 2010 (PDT)

Please unblock

Can you please unblock my other ip adress because i need it sometimes when my computer breaks down.--Lolsponge 12:32, 5 October 2010 (PDT)

Which one?? --TtsTalk 12:52, 5 October 2010 (PDT)
The one that starts with 8 but i forgot the rest and when you blocked it, it said strange ip adress.--Lolsponge 16:27, 5 October 2010 (PDT)
Surely not. This IP spammed and feel lucky that I do not block you for this too... --TtsTalk 02:01, 6 October 2010 (PDT)

TTS? Can you please find a new article for Template:Article of the Month? --Guysponge22

Read This

Geez, no need to talk to Lolsponge that way. That's why SpongePedia is crumbling down. By the way, I know it's been months but did SpongePappy really need to be punished for something he did in the GERMAN SpongePedia? By the way, you don't need to talk all fancy. You and I are on the same level, even though you are preffered over me. And don't try to deny that. --MechaTurkey 17:03, 16 October 2010 (PDT)

I agree, what happens in the German SP has nothing to do with what happens here. (although I can only imagine what excuse one can have for putting the F word on the recent changes) --スポンジ・ボブ Talk to me 17:57, 16 October 2010 (PDT)
What do you mean talking to Lolsponge "that way"? BTW: Look what SpongePappy did. And now, imagine what he could do the next time something isn't made the way he wants it to have done... Do you really expect us to work with such a user, a user that terrorizes other users, a user that insults other users in the worst way one can do that, a user that never changed his behaviour, although he has been told a lot of times? Other users are blocked, because they behave in a really bad way... It wouldn't be fair towards them to let SpongePappy stay here after all that cr*p he did. --TtsTalk 18:10, 23 October 2010 (PDT)
Okay, listen, I'm gonna put it in a language you can understand.

Surely SpongePappy do not needeth to be punished he did in the German version of our great SpongePedia. Thy shall learn once you have finished reading this. If SpongePappy did many incorrect acts of vandalazing, surely he must only be blocked in the wiki he did it at. He managed to keep this version of our great SpongePedia alive. Must I show-eth various examples? You can block him in the German version of out great SpongePedia. But he only did a few acts of vandalizing in the English version of our great SpongePedia. Is there no mercy? Is there no so-called second chances? Now, for Lolsponge. Are you gonna treat-eth him like you treat everybody else him? Will you yell at him the first time he slips up and scare him away? Open-eth your eyes oh great TattleTale Strangler, for this SpongePedia is falling to its knees-eth. Thy shall learn to treat other users with respect, Will you keep blowing-eth up every time one of our users in the English version of our great SpongePedia? Can't you see what's happening? Open-eth your EYES! Translation for everybody else: CAN'T YOU SEE SPONGEPEDIA IS SCREWED?! :P. --Turkey Warrior 12:50, 24 October 2010 (PDT)

Blind people demanding to open my eyes.... Do you know, why the German SpongePedia is so much better (btw, that's what SpongePappy said)than the English one? I'll tell you why: Because in the German one we always follow rules, because we accepted decisions, even if it wasn't our opinion... But it seems to me, you still think, SpongePedia is your webspace, your flask. You do not accept rules, you hardly accept decisions. People like you simply are not capable of working in a team! --TtsTalk 14:35, 24 October 2010 (PDT)
Leave him alone! He's right. SpongePedia IS crumbling apart. And: I think that the ENGLISH SpongePedia is way better than the german one. In the english one, you can have friends, which you don't in the german one. -- 86.46.62.55 16:10, 24 October 2010 (PDT) P.S. My dog Timmy just died a few days ago, isn't that enough for me to get sorry about?
Why must this be so strict? Is there no way to have fun during work? You guys feed us ersatz rules and then change them a minute after? Ask JapanLover97! PEOPLE LIKE YOU? Are we need-eth to point-eth fingers oh great TattleTale Strangler Duke? Listen to me. Let me show this message CLEAR and STRAIGHTFORWARD: This SpongePedia is falling APART! Is that message clear? Let me type it again: THIS SPONGEPEDIA IS FALLING APART! Even if I'm not able to work as a team, YOU WOULDN'T EVEN LET US MAKE TEAMS. We could assign each other jobs like template updater, grammar editor, etc. But YOU don't let us talk about half of the things that would make this wiki better. If you just listened to me for ONCE this wiki wouldn't be crumbling down! Is THAT clear? Oh and the German SpongePedia is like thati s because you're treating they're users like SLAVES! There I said it! You don't let them have any FUN! My gosh, I'M the blind guy?! Was this message clear oh great Duke? --Turkey Warrior 21:35, 24 October 2010 (PDT)

You still do not understand it. Of course it is ok to have fun during work. But look at the English SpongePedia: Grammar: a katastrophe. Uniformity: inexistent. completeness: negative report. I remind you: This is a WIKI. The most important things are completeness, grammar, uniformity, completeness and so on and so on. For years nobody considered those important points. What happened because of this misbehaviour? I'll tell you: Most episode articles even do not have a picture (besides the episode card). Even important articles e.g. Sandy#Trivia are full of mistakes (space before and after brackets...) or incomplete (Sandy#Apperances even a mistake in the headline!!), because nobody cares to do the "dirty" work (meaning the exhausting work. For other things look down this page "What has to be done in English SpongePedia"). THAT seems to me that you had to much fun and hardly any interest in really improving this wiki. And let me tell you one thing: "Sandy" was the first article I opened a few seconds ago... Most important an big articles are in a really bad constitution. And now tell me: If everybody can do whatever he/she wants, HOW THE HECK SHOULD IT WORK OUT TO GET THIS WIKI IMPROVED O GREAT TURKEY WARRIOR WITH LOTS OF SIGNATURES AND NO EDITS BUT COMPLAINING ABOUT GETTING NOT ENOUGH FUN, OH GREAT WARRIOR WITHOUT EVEN ONE EDIT ADDING THE Template:EpInfo IN EPISODE ARTICLES IN ORDER TO MAKE THEM BETTER, OH GREAT WARRIOR JUST YELLING AT ME AN WRITING EVERYTHING IN CAPITALS LIKE I DO NOW, OH GREAT WARRIOR TRYING TO BE SO MUCH IRONICLE, BECAUSE YOU'RE LACKING OF REAL ARGUMENTS. Think about it. But I'm afraid, you only are afraid of not getting enough fun here. --TtsTalk 01:16, 25 October 2010 (PDT)

For the record: We don't force anyone to work at the SpongePedia. If you have any problems or don't get that much F.U.N. you want to have, then I only see one possibility: LEAVE! You can ask everybody in the German SP, I guaranty you that no one will honestly say that we treat him like a slave. But users like you, who establish artificial conflicts, are the only reason why the atmosphere here gets so cold. Think about it... --Le Pfannenwender 07:59, 25 October 2010 (PDT)

OK, this has gone out of hand. It is not the matter of which SpongePedia is better, but how the two sites can use their differences to HELP each other. The Internet is free, for everyone, to give out their opinion. We need to work together in order to achieve success. Given the way TTS reacted to my friend-requesting him a few months ago and the way he is against Xat, it is clear to me that the users in the German SpongePedia work by themselves, yet in a military fashion hence what TTS said about "following rules". SpongePedia, at least the English one, is in a quiet stage right now (which is being interrupted by this argument). This is partly due to the German admins taking over the English SP, and all the stupid new rules that have been implemented. SpongePedia was fine before you showed up. Then you started telling everyone what to do, and "yelling" at everyone (Invaderzim, Lolsponge, and even us admins), creating a page about rules, and deleting the perfectly needed NSPAG page. And you honestly have no right to tell anyone what to do with their signature, or anything really. It's as if you believe that the German admins should have a higher status because they're "better". Even if Aku shares in this belief, no one in the English SP does. The only reason all these arguments before the silent stage started was because you kept yelling at everyone and telling them what to do. I'm not saying either site is better, but if we start working together we can put an end to this silent stage. And SpongePedia will be active once more. Stop acting like some kind of superior, because all admins (scratch that) users are created equal (except for vandals). --スポンジ・ボブ Talk to me 13:54, 25 October 2010 (PDT)

Hey, you are right (and I really mean that) in many points. I don't even know, why TR told me I have been rude to Lolsponge (really, I can't remember everything I might have said weeks ago. Please post a link to the questionable action of mine). I only informed him some days ago that I had to delete one of his pictures and uploaded another one of his pictures in a smaller version... Dunno why this should be wrong... And the other point: You really have to admit that there are a lot of things which are... uuhm well not at its best in this wiki. And here is the problem. When I came to English SP, I tried to show these problems but nobody cared. Nobody was willing to change something. And later, when I started bugging ('cause it really seems to me that nobody appreciated those points once), everybody told me that the English SpongePedia is fine and all articles are great and everything is nice and works out. Please be honest: This is not the truth. There are many things to get improved. But nobody cares. We tried to get into English SpongePedia in order to help, but nobody cares about what we're trying to do. Then, of course, we became angry too. Let me give you an example: When I created my account, the Template:Users in SpongePedia, a template used on lots of user and discussion pages was broken and broke the layout of all these pages. An article like Eugene H. Krabs is in a bad constitution. In February (!), I wrote it on the talk page, only the mistakes in one part... Nobody cared, nobody seems to care that even the most important articles are in a disastrous constitution. And now, please please please tell me: Why are you all just yelling at me??? I really try to improve this Wiki, why doesn't andybody help?? Why does nobody of you (TR and JL) answer those points (e.g. the point concerning the article Sandy)?? Please answer those points, because I argue with facts, You in contrary just say that I am the bad guy here. I say: I wanna help improve. But nobody besides me even admits that here is a lot of work to do. (Look at the bottom of my talk page...) --TtsTalk 15:16, 25 October 2010 (PDT)
I'll do it. I'll work on the Main Characters. Could you please unprotect SpongeBob, Patrick, Squidward, Mr. Krabs, Sandy, Gary, and Plankton? Thank You. -- 86.40.117.218 04:12, 26 October 2010 (PDT)
Well, SP... I unprotected Sheldon J. Plankton. As a sign of goodwill... But I still don't understand why nobody did that job earlier... --TtsTalk 11:23, 26 October 2010 (PDT)
Me neither. @Editing: Thank You. For letting me do this! -- 86.42.56.123 11:57, 26 October 2010 (PDT)

Unprotect2

Finished Plankton. Could you unprotect Sandy, Patrick, SpongeBob, Mr. Krabs, Gary, and Squidward? -- 86.42.56.123 13:16, 26 October 2010 (PDT)

I now unprotected Sandy Cheeks. --TtsTalk 13:34, 26 October 2010 (PDT)

Finished Sandy. Can you unprotect Gary and Mr. Krabs? Thanks. -- 86.46.55.234 13:20, 27 October 2010 (PDT)
Ok --TtsTalk 13:48, 27 October 2010 (PDT)
You can protect it again. It would be way better and way quicker if you unprotect two at a time. Mr. Krabs and Squidward please. Thank You. -- 86.46.35.56 15:19, 28 October 2010 (PDT)
Okay, I did that. Sorry for late response, I am far too busy right now-.- --TtsTalk 16:08, 29 October 2010 (PDT)
Finished Mr. Krabs and Squidward. Can you unprotect SpongeBob and Patrick? -- 86.46.36.161 16:58, 29 October 2010 (PDT)
Done. --TtsTalk 06:06, 31 October 2010 (PDT)
Hi. Is there anything else I can help with here? -- 86.46.36.236 10:54, 7 November 2010 (PST)

Well, look at the bottom of my talk page ;-) --TtsTalk 13:52, 8 November 2010 (PST)

Please!

Please don't block me for saying this, but, Please! Please! Please! Can you unblock me? I really want to work here again. I know, everybody here hates me, but PLEASE! Just in this SpongePedia, not in the german one. I know you will say no, and that it's not fair on others, but I REALLY want to work here again! I absolutely WON'T vandalise, I promise! And I will come back here everyday to work hard again! I will do ANYTHING for you Admins to work here again! ANYTHING! -- 86.40.112.89 08:15, 10 November 2010 (PST)

No. --TtsTalk 10:43, 10 November 2010 (PST)
See! I write my heart and soul onto this paragraph and you say no! -- 86.40.232.246 14:34, 10 November 2010 (PST) P.S. This will be a section for the ones who really want me back and who don't. You have to write why or why not.

Ok, this is now really annoying! We told you a hundred times, why you are blocked. Why the heck do I have to write all that cr*p again and again and again??? Forget it. You can try it again and again to mark me a tyran, a [whatever insult you, you all, want to put in here], but repeating one point again and again does not mean that this one point (you are blocked, because YOU insulted, because YOU manipulated etc pp) gets a greater weight. And now stop this. --TtsTalk 11:14, 11 November 2010 (PST)

Users in SpongePedia
123pop99 (Talk)Aku (Talk) BureaucratAMTV (Talk)AwesomeSponge (Talk)Beatlesnicole (Talk)Billy the Random Fish (Talk)Carlandre5000 (Talk)CFP (Talk) AdminDaisy13103 (Talk)Dcsga (Talk)DJ WikiBob (Talk) AdminExplodingSoda (Talk) Extramaster (Talk)Frieds (Talk)Gabbyshoe (Talk) Gopackgo0480 (Talk) GrandAdmiralPlankton (Talk) Guysponge22 (Talk) Invaderzim (Talk)JapanLover97 (Talk) AdminKatz2 (Talk)KSpongeBob (Talk) Luki (Talk) AdminLolsponge (Talk) MyLeg!!! (Talk)Myotis (Talk) Bureaucrat NickBloomSlime (Talk) Nickfan (Talk) PatrickRoolz (Talk) PatrickStar000 (Talk) Planktoni 8 (Talk)SomeDudeWithAUserName (talk)Sponge4ever (Talk) SpongeSebastian (Talk)SpongieBurger (Talk) Spongy0304 (Talk)Squidward!!!!!! (Talk)TattleTaleStrangler (Talk) AdminTrainiax (Talk) • Turkeyrules (Talk) Admin


What has to be done in English SpongePedia

  1. Too many Stubs. We have to delete some or to expand them by putting more information to the articles.
  2. There are so many broken links meaning they "are red" :D
  3. A lot of links to episode articles link to a redirect. This must be changed. (Wrong: [[The Smoking Peanut]] Right:[[The Smoking Peanut (Episode)|]])
  4. We have to change the problem with the colon. In many articles it runs "was seen in episode: The Smoking Peanut" although this would be correct: "was seen in the episode The Smoking Peanut"
  5. The layout of many pages is broken. That comes from mistakes in tables or in templates. (Remember that every table must be closed with an "|}") Luki is our man for that! :D
  6. There are too many double redirects confusing the visitors. If you delete redirects keep in mind that you have to edit all the links linking to that redirect: Change the links that they now directly link to the article!
  7. Remove the {{Slogan}}-template, Luki can set this slogan on every page via the sitenotice functions. But for this we do not need to edit articles just for removing it. Just remove the slogans on those pages you are editing some other things^^. Later, if we succeeded in improving most things here, we still can remove the slogan.
  8. (Please be so kind and do not change your signature every month or something like that. And please decide for a signature which is similar to your user name. If not, we will demand it.)
  9. There are a lot of images we do not need. They can be deleted.
  10. Orphaned pages. Link them or delete them! :D
  11. Some episode articles use the template EpInfo, some does not. Most likely because the title cards are not uploaded in the SpongePedia. Help to put the template correctly at every episode article.
  12. Links like [[Spongebob]], [[SpongeBob]] or [[Patrick]] are wrong! This is correct: [[SpongeBob SquarePants|SpongeBob]], [[Patrick Star|Patrick]], [[Sandy Cheeks|Sandy]], [[Eugene H. Krabs|Mr. Krabs]], [[Gary the Snail|Gary]]
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Community
Content
Toolbox